Why
Juries See What Judges Won’t
By
George W. Mantor | 5/1/14
Despite
having the law and the facts on their side, homeowners who challenge a
fraudclosure rarely get justice from a judge. Combined with the fact
that ninety-six percent of all foreclosures go unchallenged you have the
perfect business model for organized crime.
I
have written numerous articles on my disappointment with the devolving
of our once proud legal system and the horrible implications for our
future. Bless a Little
Fraud and More Will Surely Follow; Fraud on the Court, So Easy a
Caveman Could Do It; and Is Justice Dead? are three of my
favorites.
I
thought that, as time went by, the truth would be uncovered. But
now, years later, after billions in penalties (little of which went to
the victims) books, movies, and talk shows, most judges continue to rule
in favor of the bankstas.
I
fear we have gone past a tipping point.
I
didn’t see this coming. I
thought we could or would stop them. By
the time I realized what had happened, it was over and done. Maybe
you haven’t noticed, yet. The
system has taken over. Not
just by fiat and force where necessary, but by propaganda and false
flags.
They
have taken control of the food, (GMO and HFC), the air (chem-trails),
and the water (toxins and prescription medication).
You
can no longer peaceably assemble in public nor petition for a redress of
grievances. You are not safe
in your home from unreasonable searches and seizures. Because nobody
really cared, the tables have been turned. They
don’t work for us; we work for them.
There
was a subtle, imperceptible change in thinking and we bought right into
it. We conceded that we have
only the rights that they bestow upon us, and that is very different
from thinking that they have only the rights we bestow upon them.
They
talk a great game of freedom, opportunity, and justice but not for us,
only for them. We’ve been on lock-down since 9/11, living with martial
law, and watching our freedoms get taken in exchange for our security. While
that has been going on, they looted and started murdering us, yet never,
no matter how egregious, are officers held to account.
Everyone
has seen the blue Toyota Tacoma riddled with bullet holes by Los Angeles
police who mistook it for a black Nissan. Two women were wounded, but
fortunately, not killed.
A
case you may not know about comes from San Diego County.
On
the night of August 18, 2012, 36-year-old former Air and Sea rescue team
member, Jennifer Lynn Orey, stepped outside of her home in response to a
noise made by Sheriff's
Deputy, Luke Berhalter.
Ms.
Orey announced herself as the homeowner where upon she was gunned down
by Berhalter at point-blank range.
The
officer remains on duty and Ms.Orey’s claim for damages were denied by
the County of San Diego.
Bad,
yes, but it gets worse. San
Diego County Sheriff, Bill Gore, told KGTV the bullet fired by the
deputy only grazed Jennifer Lynn Orey's arm and amounted to nothing more
than a "scratched pinky."
Now,
in fairness to Sheriff Gore, we should keep in mind that his experience
with gunshot wounds comes from his assassinations of Vicki Weaver and
her son at Ruby Ridge over charges that were later proven false. Whoopsie.
Nonetheless,
he was unable to explain the cause of the gaping hole in Miss Orey’s
chest or what ripped out the inside of her arm.
The
bullet went through her left breast, through the bottom, going right
through her nipple, into her bicep, and then “scratched” her her
pinky as the round exited her arm.
There
has been an attitude shift among police. I
was very interested in law enforcement as a career, but more the
detective aspect rather than patrol or traffic enforcement. At
that time, police work was considered an extremely dangerous career
because the idea was that a law enforcement officer was expected to risk
his life to protect the innocent.
Under
that scenario, you would expect that, in encounters with the police,
fewer innocent people would be shot than law enforcement officers.
I
wish someone would compile a list of all of the officer related
shootings of innocent people and pets shot versus police officers, since
9/11. I’ll bet it would
look like open season on us.
Since
the economic collapse of 2008, there have been billions paid out for the
many fraudulent aspects of the MBS shuffle. Investigations
have been started and then shut down. Even
worse, they are deliberately hiding the evidence of those investigations
while refusing to release the findings.
The
truth must be much worse than we ever imagined. Of
all of those billions, the victims have gotten just a tad over squat
(usually $300) for a stolen house and all their equity.
Where
are all of these bloated and expensive agencies who were going make this
right?
They
flaunt it in our faces. They
know that we are powerless. They
own us. We do what they say.
All part of the massive,
global shift of everything to them.
So,
then we try to seek justice in court. This
proposition is so risky for either side that settlements are the result
of most litigation. But,
they won’t settle with us because they know that we have no money to
fight them.
In
court, the judge holds the homeowner to the strictest of court
procedures and aids the bankstas.
Mary
McCulley of Bozeman, Mont., had her loan changed by U.S. Bank without
her knowledge from a $300,000, 30-year loan - to a $200,000 loan due in
18 months. In documents
submitted to the court, U.S. Bank included four separate loan
applications with different terms.
The
Montana jury found US BANK liable for actual fraud, the jury found them
liable of constructive fraud and handed down a $6 million dollar
verdict, $5 million in punitive damages.
But,
beware taking on big and powerful enemies. On
April 25, 2014, Mary was forcibly hauled off to federal prison for
accusations by former American Land Title Company Employee, Tom
Cahill. Based solely on
Cahill’s word, Mary was sentenced to one year in Federal Prison. She
was immediately taken away by Federal Marshalls, and reported severe
bruising after being roughed up. Mary
is 56 years old.
Then
this happened in Aliquippa, P.A.
Widow,
Eileen Battisti, was foreclosed on and will be evicted from her $280,000
home which was sold at a tax auction for $116,000 over $6.30 in unpaid
interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.
Beware
of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love
salutations in the market place, and the chief seats in the
synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts: Which
devour widows' houses,
and for a pretense make long prayers: these shall
receive greater condemnation”
Mark 12:38-40 |
Joe
Askar, Beaver County's chief solicitor, said "It's bad - she had
some hard times, I guess her husband kind of took care of a lot of that
stuff. It seemed that she
was having a hard time coping with the loss of her husband - that just
made it set in a little more."
According
to Askar, “The judge got the decision right, based on the law. The
county never wants to see anybody lose their home, but at the same time
the tax sale law, the tax real estate law, doesn't give a whole lot of
room for error either."
Mr.
Askar, do you really expect us to believe that yours is a community so
devoid of compassion that nowhere could be found the $6.30 to prevent a
widow from being made homeless? Did
it not once ever occur to you to pay it forward, skip your latte and do
a good deed for a widow?
Where
I come from we bitch-slap men like you. And
Cahill, what about you?
It
comes down to this. The
judges are all part of the corruption. The
juries get it right, but the judge gets even. Welcome
to Gulag Amerika.
Personal
Note: This article has spawned much debate among my campaign supporters,
some of whom argued against the publishing of this piece on the grounds
that I would be viewed as some sort of malcontent which could damage my
campaign for San Diego County Assessor/Recorder/Clerk.
Here
is what I told them:
I
am a malcontent. I would not
be putting myself through this if I were content or complacent. I am not
okay with what is going on. The
only reason that my comments made them uneasy is that no one else is
talking about this.
I
am also the voice of those who have no voice. I
speak for those who get run roughshod over by a system that is
completely indifferent to them.
But,
as to the wisdom of telling uncomfortable truths, what do I have to
lose? The rich folks will
likely vote for one of the other rich folks in the race. The
parties are both spending heavily on this non-partisan office and I’m
all but invisible.
Finally,
I’m not a politician; I’m a journalist who believes that based on
his knowledge and experience he can do a better job than the other
candidates, none of whom are talking about dirty deeds and their impact
in court and on our land title records.
Early
in my campaign I was asked an amusing question. “You’re not one of
those conspiracy theorists, are you?”
I
reassured him, “No, no. I used to be, but they aren’t theories
anymore?
|