|
Public
Demands State AG's Prosecute the Criminal Side of Foreclosure
"Most foreclosures contain evidence of criminal
acts"
2/3/11
By
MSFraud.org
When
law offices, consumer advocates and the media flooded government offices with
irrefutable evidence of civil and criminal violations found in
thousands upon thousands of foreclosure cases, the willful
blindness of many state attorneys general could no longer ignore
what many have been screaming about since the 1980's S&L crisis:
Most foreclosures are a theft by deception scheme that contain
evidence of criminal acts
that include tax fraud, insurance fraud,
securities fraud, mortgage fraud, and other acts considered
state jail felonies.

Heading
up the 50-state AG investigation is Iowa AG Tom Miller (send him
a pre-printed letter here), who
pledged during a December 14 meeting: “We
Will Put People in Jail”
for foreclosure fraud. Less
than three weeks later, Mr. Miller’s growl now whimpers:
“Our focus is to reform the servicing process and that’s
inherently civil, not criminal”.
Stealing homes and equity (money) is criminal -- just ask
a banker or a little kid. Besides, the FTC tried the "reform" process with Fairbanks
Capital and
EMC Mortgage, and both were nothing short of insulting, as both
continue to breach the FTC settlement daily without penalty. Miller's
latest comment is raising public concern that the attorneys general have decided the criminal
elements are not strong enough.
Try
telling that to the Texas woman currently serving 99
years in prison
for making false statements to obtain property; one of the many
criminal charges that should haunt anyone who has
engaged in wrongful foreclosures - or is attempting to
foreclose. Especially
when you consider foreclosure-mills and foreclosure factories
make more false statements in the time it takes this woman to
sprint to the other side of her jail cell. One Texas man
is serving 25
years
for committing mortgage fraud on a single street. Sanctions,
disbarments or indictments
against corrupted lawyers and judges would quickly restore a substantial
amount of faith in
our judicial process.
Making
false statements or filing fraudulent, forged, fabricated or
counterfeit evidence in our courts and land records to obtain
void judgments to take
people’s homes and money under false pretenses is criminal.
Banks, lawyers and judges have turned Courts and Land Record offices into
Crime Scenes
The
evidence is everywhere. Investigators
will discover finding evidence to support criminal indictments
will be as easy as shooting a worm in a test-tube. MSFraud and
other advocates can locate certifiable
evidence in virtually any county courthouse and land record office
nationwide, along with shocking cases laden with criminal
evidence ripe for prosecution, if law enforcement would simply
ask.
A
Great Opportunity for Good Men and Women to do Something
This
foreclosure crisis simply could not have happened without the dereliction
of duty by many of our judges. Many of our gatekeepers
blatantly disregarded the law and refused the evidence brought
before them. Most state AG's
and the DOJ remain reluctant to get involved in individual
foreclosure cases, regardless of its evidence of crimes, so it
was impressive when Ohio AG Richard Cordray filed an amicus brief in
U.S. Bank v Renfro .
Cordray understands that when notified of a crime against the public, Attorneys
General have a duty "to prevent or halt the
commission of an offense". Speaking of good men, Ohio's
former attorney general, Marc Dann, has put his boots on the
ground to fight the foreclosure crimes in his state, and recently filed a class action against the
foreclosure-mill Lerner,
Sampson & Rothfuss. In addition, task forces have been directed by President
Obama's Executive Order
13519: ...
| "to
investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes and other
violations relating to the current financial crisis and economic
recovery efforts, recover the proceeds of such crimes and
violations, and ensure just and effective punishment of those
who perpetrate financial crimes and violations." |
and
the public is increasingly demanding these perpetrators be
prosecuted and put in prison, but we need the help of only good
men and women.
The
Foreclosure Crisis was Remedied more than a Century ago
Imagine
the time and tax dollars being wasted searching for
after-the-fact solutions to our
current foreclosure crisis, when the original remedy has remained
in law books for more than a century, and upheld in
last month's landmark
ruling from the
Massachusetts Supreme Court, which cited one case
from 1871. Many wonder if the high court opinion will morph its
way into courtrooms across the country, or will local courts and
law enforcement continue using the same type of strong-arm justice Americans
would demand from the likes of Pee-Wee Herman.
Laws
specifically enacted to protect one’s property from unlawful
seizure have remained constant, and some judges have even
stated: If you plan to take someone’s property,
you will not cross the threshold unless you possess the legal
right to
do so. But
unfortunately, finding a respectable or honorable judge to
enforce basic property law remains elusive in most foreclosure courtrooms.
For instance, in Collin County, Texas, local court rule 4.1 is suitable for carving into every foreclosure-court
wall, for with authority it commands:
|
“In
any case involving a suit on a promissory note, the original
of the note sued on must
be offered and admitted into evidence before any judgment
thereon will be rendered. The original of the promissory note
shall thereafter remain in the custody of the Court.”
|
Would
fraudulent foreclosures dare take place in a county brandishing
its “Don’t Mess With Texas” laws? Yes,
by the thousands. Judges
refuse to enforce their own local rule and local law enforcement
is evicting homeowners without a court
order. And just how many of those foreclosures may be unlawful?
According
to the Texas Foreclosure Task Force - 90%. That's
9 out of 10! Would we even have a foreclosure crisis if
judges had always forced these pretender lenders to prove they
had the legal capacity to foreclose? Probably not.
The
(pre-crisis) 2007 certified
transcript from the Texas Supreme Court “MEETING OF THE
TASK FORCE ON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE RULES” attended by
judges, lawyers, title companies, Mortgage Bankers Assoc. and
others, captured testimony from foreclosure-mill Barrett-Burke,
who stated that finding [a document] that grants the right to
foreclose “is an impossibility in 90 percent of the cases”.
Their remedy for a missing document? “They create
one”, and “we all kinda’ turn a blind-eye to it”.
Perhaps a misprison of felony charge would clean that up.
86
the phrase “Loan-Modification”
|