Updated 4/11                                             UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN RE: WILSON 

CASE NO. 07-11862

DEBTORS CHAPTER 13

Submitted by William Roper.  

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD - June 26, 2008  

ORDER GRANTING SANCTIONS - July 11, 2008  

HEARING TRANSCRIPT - August 21, 2008 

                                    The important thing to note about this transcript is Dory GOEBEL came into Federal 

                                     Bankruptcy Court and perjured herself AGAIN in direct testimony before the Judge! That is 

                                     what the ongoing perjury and sanction investigations are all about!

 

Decision on Order Denying Motion To Quash - February 6, 2009

Order Granting U.S. Trustee Discovery - February 6, 2009

 

Trustees Objection to Option One Motion for Stay - April 16, 2009

Trustees Objection to Fidelity Motion for Appeal - April 16, 2009

Court Decision Denying Stay of Discovery - June 3, 2009

U.S. Trustee Ex Parte Motion To Continue - August 18, 2009

Order Following Hearing - November 21, 2009

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR 

                                                    SANCTIONS AGAINST LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND  

                                                    THE BOLES LAW FIRM - May 21, 2010

 

U. S. TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS against LPS and the BOLES LAW FIRM - May 21, 2010

  U. S. TRUSTEE’S POST TRIAL BRIEF IN LIEU OF CLOSING ARGUMENT - 2/11

                                             Fidelity operated an affidavit-execution process that systematically caused the execution of false 

                                             affidavits. 

UPDATE: Memorandum Opinion - (4/11): CONCLUSION: The fraud perpetrated on the Court, Debtors, and trustee would be shocking if this Court had less experience concerning the conduct of mortgage servicers. One too many times, this Court has been witness to the shoddy practices and sloppy accountings of the mortgage service industry. With each revelation, one hopes that the bottom of the barrel has been reached and that the industry will selfcorrect. Sadly, this does not appear to be reality. This case is one example of why their conduct comes at a high cost to the system and debtors.

 

But for the dogged determination of the UST's office and debtors' counsel, these issues would not come to light and countless debtors would suffer. For their efforts this Court is indebted.


For the reasons assigned above, the Motion for Sanctions is granted as to liability of LPS.

 

Related Files

In Re: Taylor Opinion (4/09) Referring to the LPS computer system, the judge stated, "the flaws in this automated process become apparent." She added: "An attorney must cease processing files and act like a lawyer."

"The thoughtless mechanical employment of computer·driven models and communications to inexpensively traverse the path to foreclosure offends the integrity of our American bankruptcy system."