MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Location: file:///C:/8F031E93/SCHUMERLIFTSVEILONPATTERNOFABUSEBYMORTGAGELENDERS.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Schumer Lifs Veil on Pattern or Abuse

SCHUMER LIFTS VEIL ON PATTERN OF ABUSE BY MORTGAGE LENDERS LIKE COUNTRYWIDE
Wednesday, May 07, 2008; Posted: 06:36 PM

 

SCHUMER LIFTS VEIL ON PATTERN OF AB= USE BY MORTGAGE LENDERS LIKE COUNTRYWIDE; SYSTEMIC PILING-ON OF UNEXPLAINED FEES SOCKS BORROWERS SEEKING TO SAVE THEIR HOMES IN BANKRUPTCY=

 

At Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing, Schumer Suggests Revelation= s of Abuse Should Cause Bank of America To 'Think Harder About How To Proceed With Deal'=

 

Schumer Decries 'Deat= h by A Thousand Fees'; Suggests Better Deterrence, Stiffer Penalties, and More Disclosure to End 'Vulture Mentality' of Mortgage Lenders and Servicers

 

WASH= INGTON, DC -- U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D= -NY), the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversig= ht and the Courts, today convened a hearing of that panel to investigate allegations that mortgage lenders like Countrywide have = abused the bankruptcy system meant to help borrowers save their homes. Schumer dec= ried the lenders' tactics as amounting to "death by a thousand fees," = and he documented a pattern of abuse of borrowers through inflated, duplicative= , or made-up fees that are often undocumented, undisclosed, and occasionally unlawful. Schumer is specifically considering a number of options for legislation, including expandng the authority o= f the U.S. Trustee's office, and dramatically increasing the penalties and sancti= ons on bad-actor lenders that skirt bankruptcy law.

 

"My message to unscrupulous lenders and servicers should = be heard loud and clear: Congress will no longer countenance this vulture mentality," Schumer said. "We will not stand for the continued ab= use of homeowners who have worked hard and played by the rules of bankruptcy - = only to have their homes and credit ratings and livelihoods threatened by miscon= duct at the hands of greedy corporations who made poor bets in the first place. =

 

Given the record, I think the burden has shifted to these mort= gage companies to demonstrate that their bad practices do not form an intentional pattern or deliberate bus= iness strategy."

 

Schumer said the burden was on Countrywide and other lenders to prove the abuses were isolated incidents and not standard practice, and said that Bank of America= -whose purchase of Countrywide is expected to be completed in the third quarter of this year-should reexamine how it proceeds with the transaction.=

"These latest revelations should make Bank of America think= even harder about how they want to proceed with the deal. If it turns out that t= he purchase price for Countrywide was based in part on profits from these bad practices, Bank of America should demand a lower price, because these pract= ices will not be allowed to continue," Schumer said.

 

Countrywide is currently the target = of a federal probe over accusations of piling on improper fees, initiating foreclosure too soon, and ignoring court orders in multiple cases involving borrowers who have filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Schumer's hearing also includes testimony from the head of the U.S. Trustee's office, which initia= ted the federal investigation, as well as the head of Countrywide's loan servic= ing division, which stands accused of carrying out the questionable practices.<= o:p>

 

Robin Atchley, a former Countrywide borrower who was forced out of her home af= ter her sister's death caused her to lose her job and file for bankruptcy, will also testify about her ordeal, which is itself the subject of an investigat= ion by the Trustee's Office. In addition, Professor Kate Porter of the University of Iowa will testify about her landma= rk study that found that lenders have systemically imposed unjustified fees up= on borrowers in bankruptcy, adding thousands of dollars to their debt and preventing many of them from ever saving their homes.

 

The complete text of Senator Schumer's opening statement is be= low.

 

Senator Charles E. Schumer

Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and = the Courts

Opening Statement

May 6, 2008

 

Over the past year, we have heard much about the questionable lending practices that have harmed homeowners, roiled Wall Street, and stal= led the economy - especially the ways that greedy lenders preyed on borrowers w= ith subprime loans that many did not understand and could not afford.

 

What is far less known is the way that unscrupulous mortgage lenders and servicers have mistreated some of those same borrowers a second time - when they're down and out and at their most vulnerable - in bankrupt= cy.

 

There is a disturbing pattern of piling on that we need to get= to the bottom of.

 

So today, I want to pull the curtain back on a hidden corner of the mortgage crisis.

 

As bankruptcies swell and defaults rise and revenue streams dry up, I fear a vulture mentality is developing in some quarters.

 

And that vulture mentality threatens to turn the dream of home ownership into an even worse nightmare than it has been for many already.

 

A homeowner is down on her luck and is forced to file for bankruptcy. She successfully completes a repayment plan to keep her home through Chapter 13 protection. There has been no foreclosure because she has rationally tried to keep her home, through a Chapter 13 workout.=

 

But she then receives word that she owes more money on her mortgage than on the day she filed for bankruptcy or has to fight off foreclosure even though she h= as been making payments like clockwork.

 

How does this happen" How are these companies able to pre= y on homeowners with such impunity?

 

As Professor Kate Porter - who is a witness here today - has meticulously documented, they do it through a maze of dubious and undocumen= ted fees.

 

All too often these charges are inflated, duplicative, or made= -up. Just as often, they are undocumented, undisclosed, and = just plain unlawful. They include:

 

*Late fees

*Demand fees

*Overnight delivery fees

*Fax fees

*Payoff statement fees

*Property inspection fees; and

*Legal service fees

This is death by a thousand fees.

 

And the companies know that the hapless homeowner is too poor, too unsophisticated = or too overwhelmed to challenge often blatantly fraudulent demands for payment= .

 

Lest anyone think I am exaggerating the problem, consider the record.

 

As Judge Joel B. Rosenthal has noted, an increasing number of lenders, "in their rush to foreclose, haphazardly fail to co= mply with even the most basic legal requirements of the bankruptcy system."=

 

The catalogue of alleged misconduct is too long to list in full detail here, but companies have:

*repea= tedly sought to foreclose on homes where owners were

  current= on payments;

*sought attorneys fees in bankruptcy court for motions = that they

  have lo= st; and

*faile= d to keep even the most basic records to justify their claims in

  bankruptcy court.

 

Consider some of the stories that are unfortunately becoming routine in this lesser known corner of the subprime crisis:

 

In the case of Sharon Diane Hill in = Pittsburgh, Cou= ntrywide has admitted fabricating documents to wring dubious payments from a homeown= er in bankruptcy.

 

Judge Thomas P. Agresti, had this to= say about Countrywide's alleged fabrication of letters: "These letters are= a smoking gun that something is not right in the state of Denmark."

 

In the case of John and Robin Atchley, Countrywide twice wrongly tried to foreclose on their home when they were actually curr= ent on their payments.

 

In that case, the Regional Trustee for the Atlanta area wrote in a brief that &quo= t;Countrywide's failure to ensure the accuracy of its pleadings and accounts in [the Atchley] case is not an isolated incident."=

 

Indeed, Countrywide today says problems exist in only a small number - maybe 1% of their case (or about 650 of the 65,000 cases Countrywi= de has in bankruptcy). But court records seem to tell a dramatically differ= ent story.

 

In just one judicial district alone - the Western District of Pennsylvania alone - the Trustee is so concerned, he is looking at 300 cases involving trouble with Countrywide. Given that fact alo= ne, the 1 percent numbers seems dubious, to say the least.

 

But the questionable behavior is by no means limited to Countrywide.

 

Unfortunately, it seems dubious practices may span the loan servicing industry:

Consider the case of Jacalyn Nosek in Massachusetts, who desperately tried to save her home by diligently paying off her debts o= ver five years in Chapter 13.

 

But Amerique= st, the company servicing her loan botched receipt of her payments so badly, <= span style=3D'mso-bidi-font-weight:bold'>they practically ruined her credit and = made it impossible for her to refinance. 

Said Ms. Nosek of how she was treate= d: "I felt like somebody hit me in the stomach... and you know, sucker-punched me... I became tremendously depressed, and really since then= I haven't been able to get my feet under me."

 

The Court agreed with that assessment and sanctioned Ameriquest to the tune of $500,000 in punitive damages and $250,000 for emotional distress.

 

In the case of Pearl Maxwell, an 83-year-old Massachusetts woman with limited educa= tion, Fairbanks Capital Corporation took advantage of her by repeatedly demanding payments from her that she didn't owe. = The bankruptcy court lambasted the company's conduct, calling it "egregious and inexcusable."

 

In another case, in the Northern Dis= trict of Texas, a company filed a proof of claim that it was owed more than $1 million, when the principal balance on the note was only $60,000.

 

The list goes on and on.

 

And the bad behavior is not even limited to mortgage companies. Law firms also have gotten into the act.

 

For instance, one federal bankruptcy judge has criticized what= he called a "corrosive assemb= ly line culture of practicing law."

 

Another bankruptcy judge had this to say: "Above all else= , what kind of culture condones its lawyers lying to the court and then retreating= to the office hoping that the Court will forget about the whole matter?&qu= ot;

 

We invited a law firm to testify about its practices, but it refused, claiming over-broadly that the attorney client privilege prevented= its appearance.

 

I hope today we can begin to get to the bottom of this practic= e of piling on.

To be sure, there is some good news.

 

The United States Trustee program has launched a series of investigations into these practices, as we will hear about today.

 

Judges are finally starting to hold these firms accounta= ble.=

 

And now, Congress will play its part.

 

My message to unscrupulous lenders and servicers should be hea= rd loud and clear: Congress will no longer countenance this vulture mentality.

 

We wil= l not stand for the continued abuse of homeowners who have worked hard and played= by the rules of bankruptcy - only to have their homes and credit ratings and livelihoods threatened by misconduct at the hands of greedy corporations who made poor bets in the first place.

 

Given the record, I think the burden has shifted to these mort= gage companies to demonstrate that their bad practices do not form an intentional pattern or deliberate business strategy.

 

There are too many horror stories, too many investigations, too many sanctions imposed for us to simply take the word of a company spokesman that "mistakes were made" and that they were few in number. We ne= ed a thorough and public accounting of industry practices.

 

Let me make a point on Countrywide here. I've always wondered = why Bank of America - a fine institution with a good reputation - was willing to purchase Countrywide, given its recent history, and I understand that there= has been encouragement by the financial regulators to make this transaction hap= pen.

 

These latest revelations should make Bank of America think even harder about how they want to proceed with the deal.

 

If it turns out that the purchase price for Countrywide was ba= sed in part on profits from these bad practices, Bank of America should demand a lower price, because these practices will not be allowed to continue.<= /o:p>

 

As we go forward, we will look closely at any and all solution= s to these problems.

 

Do we need better deterrence" Stiffer penalties" More robust disclosures?<= /o:p>

 

We will consider any and all such options. I look forward to hearing from all of our witnesses.

 

I now recognize Senator Sessions for an opening statement.

 

htt= p://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1517100/

 

Back to MSFraud.or= g